Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 3121 - 3140
of 51,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
" In Koch v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 8:58 pm
I put up a short post on the argument in Smith v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am
And while it will likely take years for the case to reach a conclusion, the litigation itself has already shown — in three key ways — the power of strategic litigation to swiftly generate meaningful impacts, including long before final judgment. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:00 am
An 18-year delay by the State Division of Human Rights in issuing its determination characterized as being “jurisprudentially intolerable”Matter of New York State Dept. of Correction and Community Supervision v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 137 AD3d 1512, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn August 1995 Kenneth W. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
In Bloomfield State Bank v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 12:27 am
Here is the abstract:this essay, we consider the long-term legal significance of the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm
United States, et al. (638 Contract for Law Enforcement Services; Law Enforcement Assist Agreement) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Montana Democratic Party, et al. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
In Robotti & Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 1:14 pm
Seems like you could just write it out.But as long as everyone know what you mean, it probably doesn't really matter much. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:58 am
In Stephans v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
’” Citing McFarland v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 108, the court explained that "[A]s long as the investigation is sufficient and the [petitioner is] afforded a full opportunity to present his [or her] claims, [i]t is within the discretion of [SDHR] to decide the method or methods to be employed in investigating a claim. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 7:17 am
In this day and age in which parties obtain an order regarding child support in one state and then move to another jurisdiction, it is important to know that the original support order cannot be modified or even extended by a court in the second state, so said the New York Court of Appeals in the case Spencer v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:58 am
For example, in SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:58 am
For example, in SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 3:37 am
Union of India v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:39 am
") AC34106 - State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:47 am
In Wilgus v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm
” United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
At long last, the en banc 11th Circuit today decided United States v. [read post]
