Search for: "State v. Race" Results 3121 - 3140 of 8,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 7:17 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (involving Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:17 am by John Hopkins
Today, in the National Law Journal, two former Supreme Court Justices spoke out; Former Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court Ruth V. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:19 pm by Amy Howe
The justices added three new cases to their merits docket: United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Facebook threats case, continues. [read post]
8 May 2018, 8:48 am by Eric Dama
In 1973, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark employment discrimination case, McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 8:48 am by Eric Dama
In 1973, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark employment discrimination case, McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:05 am
District Court for the Western District, styled United States of America v Paul Hollern, Case No. 3:06CR-82-S. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
He claimed: The Japanese race is an enemy race and while many second and third generation Japanese born on United States soil, possessed of United States citizenship, have become ‘Americanized,’ the racial strains are undiluted. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 5:12 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  They also claim that it would impair state laws that prohibit consideration of race in the underwriting or rating process because, to avoid potential disparate impact liability, insurers would need to collect and consider data about characteristics such as race and national origin. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:05 am
The California Supreme Court invalidated the state's anti-miscegenation statute on state constitutional grounds in Perez v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia State Board of Elections, upholding one of 12 Virginia electoral districts against a racial gerrymandering challenge and sending the remaining 11 back to the district court to reconsider whether race was the predominant factor in drawing the district lines. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:44 am by Andrew Koppelman
The Equal Protection Clause is the reason the Court has struck down laws that impose certain inequalities, such as the race discrimination that was challenged in Brown v. [read post]