Search for: "State v. True" Results 3121 - 3140 of 21,804
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2014, 7:57 pm
The recently published case Cheal v El Camino Hospital out of Santa Clara (2014)is a classic example of a situation where the whole case rested one witness statement. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner made an application to the New York State Office of Children and Family Services [OCFS] to amend the indicated report of the State Central Register from "indicated" to "unfounded" and to seal the report. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court denied Westbury's motion and Westbury appealed the court's ruling.Citing Shah v Exxis, Inc., 138 AD3d 970, the Appellate Division explained that "[on] a motion pursuant to CPLR §3211(a)(7) to dismiss [an action] for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit… [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Eric Lomazoff's important new book, Reconstructing the National Bank Controversy, is the first scholarly study that views the National Bank controversy as a continuous 55-year sequence of events, whose highlights include the adoption of Alexander Hamilton's proposed Bank of the United States in 1791, John Marshall's decision in McCulloch v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner made an application to the New York State Office of Children and Family Services [OCFS] to amend the indicated report of the State Central Register from "indicated" to "unfounded" and to seal the report. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:08 am by Florian Mueller
Today the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a motion by Verizon, the American Association of Advertising Agencies and the Ford Motor Company to participate in the September 11, 2013 hearing on the Apple v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court denied Westbury's motion and Westbury appealed the court's ruling.Citing Shah v Exxis, Inc., 138 AD3d 970, the Appellate Division explained that "[on] a motion pursuant to CPLR §3211(a)(7) to dismiss [an action] for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit… [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 9:12 am
In Rose, though, a capital murder case, the exclusion of the latent print testimony gutted the State's case. [read post]