Search for: "US v. Green"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 6,077
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2014, 8:26 am
JUBIE, individually, Appellants (Defendants) v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm
This essay is adapted from his foreword to Eugene Volokh, Sebelius v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
EME Homer City[1] and Seventh, United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:44 am
At his Employer Handbook Blog, Eric Meyer brings us the story of Powell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:44 am
At his Employer Handbook Blog, Eric Meyer brings us the story of Powell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
The case of Ironside v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Green (1980), where the Court held that Bivens was available for a federal public-prison inmate despite the availability of the FTCA. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am
Instead, as the brief clarifies, the Greens allege that they would be complicit in the use of contraceptives by virtue of their direction, i.e., as a result of the choices that they make as directors [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division also noted that the supervisor who allegedly indicated a discriminatory motive was not the ultimate decision-maker, and the record shows that BOE immediately offered Petitioner another tenured track position after terminating his employment in the Homebound Program.The court commented that the same result would obtain whether the matter was analyzed pursuant to the traditional framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, or… [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:46 am
Green that this alternative remedy is insufficient to preclude Bivens. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:41 am
(v) Are there any subsisting appeals against the listing? [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
Figgie Intl. v Town of Huntington, 203 AD2d 416, 418-419; but cf. 202 Devs. v Town of Haverstraw, 175 AD2d 473), and it is not before us now....Even if a property owner may claim vested rights in reliance on an unconditional final approval of a site plan, it is undisputed that the Planning Board never granted unconditional approval of the plaintiffs' site plan. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
Figgie Intl. v Town of Huntington, 203 AD2d 416, 418-419; but cf. 202 Devs. v Town of Haverstraw, 175 AD2d 473), and it is not before us now....Even if a property owner may claim vested rights in reliance on an unconditional final approval of a site plan, it is undisputed that the Planning Board never granted unconditional approval of the plaintiffs' site plan. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:54 am
The amount of time in which those using the TVG had to submit their registration after their use stopped was two years but is now just one year (from the date the use stopped). [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:16 pm
Both were admitted for use in open court during the first Oracle v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Accompanying said tweet was a snap of a shop frontage in familiar dark green and white livery, an iconic 'siren' logo, and the words DUMB STARBUCKS COFFEE emblazoned across the entrance.As the word spread, further details began to emerge. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:02 am
For most taxpayers, this means that the figure in box 6 is equal to the figure in box 5 times 1.45% (as in my example indicated by the green arrow since $50,000 x 1.45% = $725). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm
Republished by Blog Post Promoter Reuters reports that in Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Here BP claimed that the second defendant, which ran a filling station under the ‘TOP’ brand used the same colour green as them, and argued that members of the public would be confused into thinking their garage was a BP garage. [read post]
