Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 3121 - 3140 of 9,858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
McIntyre Machinery employed a distributor to sell its machines in the United States, including New Jersey. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
”[3] In South Carolina, “unprepared food that lawfully may be purchased with United States Department of Agriculture food coupons” is exempt from the state’s sales and use tax.[4] Meanwhile, other states categorize sales tax status based primarily on who the vendor is or where the food is consumed. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
United States HUD (opinion here) in which Judge Kavanaugh asked the DC Circuit to rule that “all discriminatory transfers (and discriminatory denials of requested transfers) are actionable under Title VII. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
United States HUD (opinion here) in which Judge Kavanaugh asked the DC Circuit to rule that “all discriminatory transfers (and discriminatory denials of requested transfers) are actionable under Title VII. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:20 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
President Donald Trump introduces him as his nominee to the United States Supreme Court during an event in the East Room of the White House July 9, 2018, in Washington, DC. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:13 pm by David Kopel
The prohibition was acknowledged to be the broadest in the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Accordingly Pereira was able to successfully claim that he had been "physically present" in the United States for more than ten years.The same theory is applied in New York State cases involving "proper service" of a notice of discipline in DiPillo v Jacknis. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 5:40 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
The Sixth Circuit made clear that Lagosabrogated the holding of United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The post highlights the need to be aware of the e-Privacy Regulation and the additional regulatory burden this would impose come 2019. [read post]