Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2014, 6:19 pm
And that’s as good a reminder as any that, tomorrow, Lawfare will resume coverage of pretrial motions hearings in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 1:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:59 am
Rule 62(1)(c) of the Trade Marks Rules 2008 states:"62. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
Mark Walsh has a first-hand look at yesterday’s argument in Flowers v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 10:30 am
The logo is a registered trade mark, owned by the New York State Department of Economic Development. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
United States Surgical Corp., 147 F.3d 1374, 1380 (Fed. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 2:11 am
As does Mark Levin. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 8:33 am
“Channel One Russia Worldwide” v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:42 am
June — same issue as in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
The “mother case” is Marks v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:12 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Michael Mannheimer asks how professors should teach United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
(internalquotation marks omitted). [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:05 am
It offered no evidence of use of its mark prior to that date.Weatherford needed to prove that its owns "a mark or trade name previously used in the United States ... and not abandoned. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 9:55 am
The case is titled Club De Futbol America v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 1:41 pm
Limited Partnership v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:43 pm
In 2008, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York had made headlines in the same case when it decided to allow French, Dutch, and British investors to be included in the class. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 8:26 pm
The matter is entitled, Jack Russell, Plaintiff v. [read post]
