Search for: ". Kerr"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 6,254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2012, 10:00 am
Kerr, CSMR (Ret.) [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:07 pm
Warren “did not list herself with the AALS as the rightful Empress of France” [Popehat; Seth Mandel, Commentary] Jeffrey O’Connell, greatly admired and influential torts scholar at the University of Virginia, retires from teaching [via Robinette] New Brian Tamanaha book on law schools stirs wide interest [Orin Kerr, Scott Greenfield, Chron of Higher Ed via TaxProf, Bill Henderson] In recent criminal law and procedure cases, high-level academic opinion did sway… [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:45 am
Kerr v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am
Sometimes legal counsel take positions in court determined solely by the expediency of what expert witnesses are available, and what opinions are held by those witnesses. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am
Starting this morning in the Supreme Court is the appeal of Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, listed for two days in front of a panel of five (L Hope, L Walker, L Kerr, L Clarke, L Dyson). [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am
On 8 to 10 May 2012 the Supreme Court (Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson) heard Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against decision that he should provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am
On 8 to 10 May 2012 the Supreme Court (Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson) heard Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against decision that he should provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
12 May 2012, 2:34 am
"Notably, Orin Kerr responds to Olivas by asking, "what's so bad about that? [read post]
10 May 2012, 3:16 pm
(Orin Kerr) The Chronicle of Higher Education has an interesting article on responses to a forthcoming book I recently blogged about, Brian Tamanaha’s Failing Law Schools. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am
The case was heard in April by the Supreme Court Justices Lord Hope, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Dyson and Lord Reed. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:09 pm
(Orin Kerr) That is, with respect to his support for same-sex marriage, telling ABC’s Robin Roberts: Over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors when I think about members of my own staff who are in incredibly committed monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together, when I think about those soldiers or airmen or marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained, even now that… [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:54 pm
(Orin Kerr) The news is here, announcing that Ward Farnsworth is the new Dean. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
The key legal questions facing Lords Phillips, Brown and Kerr are likely to concern the interpretation of: (1) The Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006; (2) UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency; and (3) The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Requests and Orders) Order 2005. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am
Starting on Tuesday 8 May 2012 in front of Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson is the hearing of Phillips v Mulcaire. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:08 am
The first is Orin Kerr's detailed discussion of Brian Tamanaha's forthcoming book, Failing Law Schools. [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:56 am
The reason it's been so hard becomes readily apparent from Orin Kerr's description of Tamanaha's book: In most states, you can’t be a lawyer unless you graduated from an ABA-accredited school. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:12 pm
Orin Kerr (George Washington), Brian Tamanaha’s Failing Law Schools: Brian’s basic argument is that law schools have been on an unsustainable path fueled by the ready availability of student loans, the cartel power of the ABA, and the influence of the U.S. [read post]
6 May 2012, 3:38 pm
(Orin Kerr) Last week I had the pleasure of reading a pre-publication draft of Brian Tamanaha’s new book, Failing Law Schools, which has not yet been released but can be pre-ordered now. [read post]
6 May 2012, 3:50 am
The only explanation for this subpoena is that the Brain Trust at Cooley thinks this is a fine tactic to shut its critics up, and so they've chosen to go on the offensive after their critics.They chose poorly.Not only have they brought their scheme to the attention of the blawgosphere, with Paul Horowitz at PrawfsBlawg and Orin Kerr at Volokh Conspiracy raising the secondary alarms, but they pushed their primary blawgy nemesis, Campos, to lay it all out on… [read post]
5 May 2012, 1:23 pm
(Orin Kerr) Strange but true. [read post]
