Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 10,147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
There is an abundant historical record supporting the conclusion that the United States Constitution was promoted by a core group of political leaders in order to strengthen the national government, and that the Constitution was understood by the people during the ratification debate to do just that. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:09 am
United States, and decided that Gordon Hirabayashi, a college student, was guilty of violating a curfew order. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
.: The German Marshall Fund of the United States will host a panel discussion on Ukraine’s upcoming presidential elections. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:18 am
District Court for the Southern District of California in SEC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am
v=qlRtLGorhdY Pricing: Per month per user fees. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Many Americans do not pay their tax bills on time, if ever. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
United Sta [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am
As of today, a federal judge and the President of the United States support the result in Texas v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:04 am
” This follows directly from New York v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 7:41 am
In Texas v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Robbins and Bowles v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 2:22 am
In Lynch v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:15 pm
Timbs v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:50 am
Case date: 27 November 2018 Case number: No. 15-3560 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:46 pm
New SB 35 Implementing Regulations Senate Bill 35, more colloquially known as “SB 35,” was signed into law by Governor Brown on September 29, 2017. [read post]
