Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 3141 - 3160
of 5,623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2014, 10:02 pm
That is what Food Sentry does. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 9:37 pm
That approach will do much to quiet the domestic law questions that would likely arise with direct participation in hostilities in the form of airstrikes (see here for my earlier comments on that issue vis-a-vis the airstrike option, and here and here for Jack’s). [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:07 pm
It is not limited to expressions of or critiques of political views, but rather extends to all matters of public administration and public concern including comments about the adequacy or inadequacy of performance of public duties by others vi) The cases draw a distinction between fact on the one hand, and comment on matters of public interest involving value judgment on the other. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 2:13 pm
Preliminarily, the Court notes that our Court of Appeals has held that the doctrine of collateral estoppel does not apply to an unmixed question of law. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:39 pm
A contempo-rary example is the six Star Wars movies: Episodes IV, V, and VI were produced before I, II, and III. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:57 am
What benefit does a purchase money security interest confer upon a secured party? [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:59 am
HUD further argues that its disparate impact rule does not contravene McCarran-Ferguson and was promulgated in accordance with the APA. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 2:19 pm
The possible disparity of treatment between prior New York offenders vis-a-vis prior out-of-State offenders does not vitiate the legislative decision that an individual who has previously elected to violate the criminal standards of the society in which he was found should be treated as an habitual offender. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
But there is no such legal obligation: The so-called “employer mandate” does not exist. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:13 am
More specifically, subsection 10(9)(b) of CASL, which is one category of implied consent under the new legislation, provides: “(9) Consent is implied for the purpose of section 6 only if … (b) the person to whom the message is sent has conspicuously published, or has caused to be conspicuously published, the electronic address to which the message is sent, the publication is not accompanied by a statement that the person does not wish to receive unsolicited commercial… [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:50 pm
[Since changing Parameter VI does not necessarily create a one clock cycle delay], Parameter VI is not a “value that is representative of an amount of time to transpire after which the memory device outputs the first amount of data. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:24 am
In this respect, its fidelity is like that of the more recent Battlestar Galactica vis-à-vis the less recent one. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
The judge also noted, however, that the Department of Justice “does dispute whether Zhu's expectation of privacy was reasonable. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 2:42 pm
Alternatively, although the court has previously determined that the juvenile committed at least one crime, if the court determines that the respondent does not require supervision, treatment or confinement, the court shall dismiss the petition akin to Matter of Jens P., Matter of Kyung C. and Matter of Ejiro A. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:30 am
The law does not require a ‘set-aside’ in any situation. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:30 am
The law does not require a ‘set-aside’ in any situation. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 1:46 pm
The Report is as full-throated a defense of Executive power vis a vis Congress as you will find. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 11:46 am
Because of this – especially in light of this ruling – just because the parties agree, that does not mean that the settlement is proper or will be affirmed by the district court (or on appeal). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:52 am
” Certainly, Parameter VI is one factor that mayaffect the amount of time that passes before data is trans-ferred but it does not represent that time. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 3:06 am
Does this imply that when the Lt. [read post]
