Search for: "In v. United States" Results 3141 - 3160 of 102,787
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Collins is a continuation of aggressive, formalist opinions by the Roberts Court on separation of powers issues, striking down numerous agency arrangements with barely a nod to originalist sources.In United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by David Lynn
United States, 50 F.4th 498, 529 (5th Cir. 2022) (citation omitted). [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm by Ilya Somin
Worcester ed., 1859) (defining "office" as "a publick charge or employment; magistracy");United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 5:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
But unlike in 2000 the general political instability in the United States makes the situation now much more precarious. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2022) Having found the dispute over the ’562 patent moot, the court next considered the proper disposition—whether to simply dismiss the appeal or also vacate the PTAB decision under United States v. [read post]
Reaction against the laws has been swift with Texas Democrats calling the bill “the most extreme anti-immigrant state bill in the United States,” and immigrant rights groups have sued to halt the law. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:10 am by A. Hunter Faulkner, Esq.
Recently, a federal jury in the Middle District of Missouri found the National Association of Realtors (“NAR”) and two major real estate brokerages—Keller Willams and HomeServices of America—liable under United States antitrust laws for conspiring to fix prices in the class action lawsuit, Burnett v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 5:45 am by Spencer Overton
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, is on SSRN: This brief—filed by five law professors as amici curiae in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:28 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Once United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) determines that two regulatory criteria have been met, it conducts a second layer of review – the “final merits determination” pursuant to Kazarian v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Price
Mockus for committing blasphemy during his lectures in State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
Case date: 05 December 2023 Case number: No. 22-1006 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]