Search for: "J. H.1" Results 3141 - 3160 of 4,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
When the Supreme Court decided the Daubert case in June 1993, two recent verdicts in silicone-gel breast implant cases were fresh in memory.[1] The verdicts were large by the standards of the time, and the evidence presented for the claims that silicone caused autoimmune disease was extremely weak. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm by Giles Peaker
H&F first placed her in a room in ‘Rose Lodge’. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit 2015) (Gorsuch, J., concurring). [read post]
22 May 2018, 11:05 pm by Tessa Shepperson
If you are interested in this sort of thing, there is an excellent book An Introduction to English Legal History by J H Baker which explains it all in detail (and now there is also my History of Law Blog). [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:10 am by maureen
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURETo ensure compliance with requirements imposed by = the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax = advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), = unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be = used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties = under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or = recommending to another party any matters addressed = herein. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
” (quoting Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 112 (1872) (Bradley, J., dissenting))). [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:48 am by maureen
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURETo ensure compliance with requirements imposed by = the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax = advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), = unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be = used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties = under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or = recommending to another party any matters addressed = herein. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:08 am by Joy Waltemath
On appeal, the court first noted that while the workers’ comp Act requires an employer to provide an injured worker with “reasonable and necessary health care services from a health care provider,” the term “health care provider” in Sec. 52-4-1(H) and (O) does not include a dispenser of medical marijuana under the Compassionate Use Act. [read post]