Search for: "Nation v. Nation"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 56,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2013, 4:42 am
From this just-completed Term of the Supreme Court, a clear example is the Court’s 5-4 decision in Clapper v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 7:40 am
Here are the amici curiae in the matter of Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:46 pm
New Amicus briefs were filed in support of the Tribe in the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
I hope that someday it is more than a pipe dream, because the America of the Pew survey above is one that seems destined to follow the path of the formerly great nations which preceded it. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 3:22 pm
The EEOC filed the suit (EEOC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
EPA, Texas Water Development Board v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:24 am
Discovery in Missouri v. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 6:59 pm
Fragante v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:10 am
On March 30, 2010 the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit issued a decision in the Peconic Baykeeper v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:52 am
Regina (NM) v Islington Borough Council: [2012] EWHC 414 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 52 “When considering whether a duty of assessment of needs for community care services had arisen under section 47(1) of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990 the interpretation of the words ‘may be in need of any such services’ covered both cases of present need and a narrow penumbra of cases of reasonably predictable future need.”… [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:28 am
Regina (Nassery) v Brent London Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 539; [2011] WLR (D) 156 “Where a local authority was assessing whether a person was ‘in need of care and attention’ for the purposes of section 21(1)(a) of the National Assistance Act 1948 the primary focus was on present rather than future needs, but provided there was a present need for some sort of care an authority was also empowered to intervene before it became much worse. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:41 pm
I haven’t had a chance to look at the judgment in full (YL (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) (FC) (Appellant) v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:01 am
A significant number of EU Member States is yet to complete the national transposition process, despite the deadline of 7 June 2021. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:15 pm
Native Ecosystems Council alleges that the Forest Service violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) when it issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Decision Notice approving the Project. [read post]
7 May 2018, 2:09 pm
Jill Adams quoted by The Cut, May 7, 2018 “Iowa’s six-week ban on abortion provisions is the latest attempt of many by abortion opponents to enact patently unconstitutional laws in the hopes of teeing up a case that would allow the Supreme Court to strike down Roe v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 12:45 pm
Nothing in the text of the National Labor Relations Act changed in that interval; it contains no language granting the Board authority over Indian tribes. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:28 am
Supreme Court has conference scheduled for 14 March 2008 for the following case relevant to rape and child abuse prosecutions.Docket: 07-886Case name: Iowa v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 6:05 am
In a recent judgment in the interstate case Ukraine v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:56 pm
More details of Greenburg v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 3:05 am
It changed our nation. [read post]
