Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 3141 - 3160 of 3,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2016, 9:22 am by Phyllis H. Marcus and Matthew W. Modell
Starbucks, Kraft Foods Tassimo Pod Suit Dismissal Affirmed by Sixth Circuit In Montgomery v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
 Not according to a recent decision by a California intermediate appellate court in Jarvis v Jarvis, No. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
The regulation is part of an effort to preserve the reproductive rights of women in the aftermath of the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
13 May 2017, 10:22 am by Schachtman
The law of products liability typically states that a manufacturer or seller is held to the level of an expert in knowing the harmful aspects of its products. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 12:14 pm
(picture, left - Justice Kennedy) The test was whether the invention produced a "useful, concrete and tangible result"(State Street Bank & Trust Co v Signature Financial Group (1998) ). [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
(IP Think Tank) Whitehouse.gov’s 3rd party content under CC-BY (Creative Commons) EFF’s site FreeYourPhone.org launches, pushes for new DMCA exemption (Ars Technica) Corporation of Public Broadcasting agrees on internet royalty payments (ContentAgenda) Music piracy not that bad, industry says (TorrentFreak)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court W D Virginia: Judge decides 17,000 illegal downloads don’t equal 17,000 lost sales: United… [read post]