Search for: "State v. Country" Results 3141 - 3160 of 26,680
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2022, 4:03 pm by Nancy Yaffe
On June 24, 2022, the United State Supreme Court held in Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 8:53 am by JURIST Staff
As a brief overview, in the United States, the number of discriminatory bills targeting LGBTQ+ folks proposed by state lawmakers reached an all-time high in 2022. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:02 pm by Joseph Margulies
Likewise, I am furious at the recent Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
“The United States,” an NBC report notes,” is currently the only country in the world that sentences juveniles to life without the possibility of parole. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
The Supreme Court confronted this issue in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 5:24 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Royal Dutch Shell Yen Thi Hong Nguyen & Dung Phuong Nguyen, The efforts to respond to climate change and implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) from the hardest-affected countries: Vietnam case analysis Délton Winter de Carvalho, Constitucionalismo Climático como fundamento transnacional aos litígios climáticos Artigos Gilmara Benevides C. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 11:23 pm by Josh Blackman
Gorsuch wrote: In a large and diverse country, offense can be easily found. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 10:57 am by Michael Ehline
Any new car assessment program implemented in the country must conform to the rules and regulations highlighted in the Highway Safety Code. [read post]
The state of New York, in an emergency session Friday, passed a new gun law in response to the US Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
Oklahoma, which reinforced that much of Oklahoma was, legally, Indian country, where many crimes were beyond the reach of the state and its laws. [read post]
In particular, we were skeptical that Trump’s speech would satisfy the stringent requirement of Brandenburg v. [read post]