Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 29,346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2011, 2:43 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:11 pm
The case is entitled Essex v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:37 am
The question is whether it's unconstitutional for the state to make public donors to that Proposition. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The judgment merely states thatcat conceptually confused “it is sufficient to recall that, according to settled case-law, the repute of a trade mark is relevant, in assessing the likelihood of confusion, only as regards the repute of the earlier mark”, citing Gitana v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA), T‑569/11 (2013) (para 98). [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” As Chief Justice Marshall put it (quoting Justice Ginsburg in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Union v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:06 am
Zubik v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:31 pm
Kern County Water Agency v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 7:44 am
” Plus, the district court had reexamined other parts of the claim when the case was remanded for further proceedings in light of Martinez v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
In Miller v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:23 pm
Dickens v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 1:53 pm
In light of the Florida Supreme Court’s recent ruling in McKenzie Check Advance of Florida, LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:32 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 4:17 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 3:21 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 11:26 am
NetChoice and NetChoice v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
In light of the state’s minimal control over personal assistants, the Illinois State Labor Relations Board held in 1985 that personal assistants weren’t state employees. [read post]
