Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 3141 - 3160
of 51,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2024, 3:31 pm
Indeed, officials have long relied on such programs to advance the same objectives that underlie the CHNV Parole Program. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 8:33 am
Case citation: Cisneros v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
The Supreme Court of the United States yesterday announced its decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 3:20 pm
A four-year-long court dispute over the constitutionality of Wisconsin's domestic registry statute for same-sex couples arrived at the state's supreme court in October. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Foreword: Buckley v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:31 am
By Jason Rantanen Genetics Institute, LLC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:53 am
In the case of Allstate Insurance Company v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
International Justice, Wild West v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 10:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
The Secretary of State refused to allow this. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 8:32 am
One of the appellate judges went so far as to say that the reason Ohio could not take the early voting days away is because the state had a bad history of long lines at the polls in 2004, and the early voting in 2008 seemed to clear up this problem. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am
Proc. 4(k)(1)(A), the federal court was required to interpret California’s long-arm statute in order to determine its own jurisdiction.) [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:27 am
(Eugene Volokh) In today’s United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:58 pm
Cir. 2004), the court stated: “This court has previously identified, inter alia, commercial success, satisfaction of a long-felt need, and copying to be relevant factors. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:37 pm
He famously broke with the conservatives in the NFIB v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Juliana v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:30 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 12:29 pm
The appeals court explained that the Howey opinion set forth a test for determining if something is an investment contract and, thus, a security, but that Florida courts had used Howey in a logically untenable manner beyond this specific purpose (Githler v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:16 pm
In a 1981 case, Edwards v. [read post]
