Search for: "State v. Square"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 6,574
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
In a previous post, we considered the factual background to the appeals before the Supreme Court this week in the cases of R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:34 pm
Inc. v City of Norfolk, 2016 WL 360775 (4th Cir. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:54 pm
The “repeated physical trauma” language above quoted falls squarely within Festa. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
The Supreme Court will spend the first half of this week hearing the appeals in three related cases: R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 8:51 am
When the Supreme Court hands down its ruling in this Term’s blockbuster abortion case, the Justices should make clear that courts should not rubberstamp laws that deny women liberty, equality, and dignity.At issue in the case of Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:20 pm
Jaeger v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:53 am
See Printz v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
Clark v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:06 am
(Cotter v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:05 am
An employer’s stated desire for diversity in the workplace does not, without more, establish discriminatory intent. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
But rather than stop there (as the Court's 2009 decision in Pearson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:05 pm
Those decisions – the first to squarely interpret “comparable work” in the context of the state’s equal pay act – failed, as the dissenting justices noted in Jancey II, to look “beyond job labels” and perceptions of job differences “that are, in part at least, artifacts of sexual stereotyping and traditional job segregation by gender. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:05 pm
Those decisions – the first to squarely interpret “comparable work” in the context of the state’s equal pay act – failed, as the dissenting justices noted in Jancey II, to look “beyond job labels” and perceptions of job differences “that are, in part at least, artifacts of sexual stereotyping and traditional job segregation by gender. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:44 am
The blame gameFrom one media commentator that blame and accountability fall squarely upon the Crown. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
In Kelo v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:16 pm
” This is hardly the kind of independent advocacy the Supreme Court was referring to in Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 1:45 pm
General Talking Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Denying the employer’s motion to dismiss her claim for lost wages and salary incidental to the reinstatement of benefits, the district court found the employee stated a plausible claim under ERISA, Section 510, and rejected the notion that her theory of liability failed as a matter of law (Marin v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 1:52 pm
But amidst the intense focus on Reno v. [read post]
