Search for: "State v. Tech"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 5,366
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Tech. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 7:16 am
This case is particularly interesting because it involves many spicy ingredients: a smartphone IP dispute between two tech giants (Google and Oracle), a lot of money at stake, a potential fair use exception, and copyright law in the computer context. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 10:29 pm
" (quoting Celeritas Techs., Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
The Canadian case, known as Kevin Fearon v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:55 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:50 am
No. 10/712,938; Tech. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:46 pm
Commil is the Court’s third recent foray into this terrain.The first was Global-Tech v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 8:35 pm
" In Global-Tech v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:35 pm
In Apple v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:50 pm
In a decision handed down Wednesday by a three-judge panel of the First Appellate District Court of Appeal, the court went against a 2013 United States Supreme Court decision known as Maryland v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 3:44 pm
Astra Tech, Inc., the trial court had admitted an out-of-state attorney pro hac vice to represent the plaintiff in the underlying lawsuit. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
§ 271(b); and (2) whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:21 am
Tech., Inc., 523 U.S. 751, 756 (1998) (stating that “tribal immunity is a matter of federal law and is not subject to diminution by the States”); Cook v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:26 am
’” Summary judgment was granted on his ADA and state law claims (Morriss v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
& Tech. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Hydranautics v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
Eric Goldman, director of the High Tech Law Center at Santa Clara University in the United States, questions that approach to regulating the Internet. [read post]
