Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 7,092
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2008, 3:05 pm
Under the overruled decision, _S.F. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm
Ignatius asks what local forces the United States plans to support in the fight against the Islamic State given that a “strong, reliable, indigenous Sunni ground force” does not appear to exist in the region and that efforts to create one have largely ended in failure. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
United States (1926) claimed that the Supreme Court should not treat as an important precedent the Tenure of Office Act of 1867 because everyone knew Reconstruction was a time in which Republicans were engaged in pure politics. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
The rule, as drafted, would prohibit employers throughout the United States from relying on or enforcing covenants to not compete. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
The couple became civil partners in the United Kingdom, then emigrated to Canada. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
HB4 is extreme anti-immigrant state legislation, and an extraordinary state arrogation of the exclusively federal power to regulate entry to and exit from the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm
S. 633 (2010) (quoting, for its current relevance, statement in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Since Begum, there has been Tsfayo v United Kingdom 48 EHRR 18. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Since Begum, there has been Tsfayo v United Kingdom 48 EHRR 18. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 12:48 am
And, As Judge Weinstein observed in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm
The great object [of the statute]… was to protect the merchant vessels of the United States and their crews from piratical aggressions. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 8:00 pm
United States, 54 App. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am
For example, in the securities law context, a Second Circuit panel upheld the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest, but only after finding that a private plaintiff—not the state plaintiffs—had Article III standing (See, XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:08 am
Kennedy authored the second, United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm
” That process unfolds as follows: the Attorney General may (and reliably does) oppose the request for disclosure by filing an affidavit stating that the disclosure “would harm the national security of the United States,” per 50 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:24 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:47 am
John’s United Church of Christ v. [read post]
