Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 8,957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 10:25 am
” The United States intervened to defend the statute. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 2:41 pm
Based on the evidence presented, the AAO concluded that the beneficiary will not be employed in the United States, and was not employed abroad, in a capacity involving specialized knowledge. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
United StatesDocket: 11-955Issue(s): Whether the McCormick v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:56 pm
He also affirmed, in response to a question from Justice Stevens, that the United States was arguing that forum non conveniens can be considered before both subject-matter and personal jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 5:11 am
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, stated that “ Chevron is overruled. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:16 pm
United States 14-740Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the petitioner in this case.Issue: Whether the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies to a search warrant that is itself the fruit of the poisonous tree. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
United States (06-1456). [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 10:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:09 am
The Board had ruled that Petitioner Australian Therapeutic lacked standing because it had agreed not to use or register the mark NAKED for condoms in the United States, and further had agreed that Respondent could use and register the mark, and so Australian did not have a real interest in this proceeding or a reasonable basis for its belief of damage. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 11:23 am
Weexplained that the Board’s interpretation of its regulationsin denying the proposed amendment was reasonableunder the particular circumstances in Proxyconn and wasconsistent with the United States Patent and TrademarkOffice’s (“PTO’s”) position expressed in the Board’s informativedecision in Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:12 am
The Supreme Court of the United States on Tuesday issued its opinion in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 4:07 pm
GRANTED 2/23/2009QUESTIONS PRESENTED:Petitioner, who has lived in this country for nearly 40 years and served in the United States Army, is a legal permanent resident of this country, not a citizen. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:11 pm
Yes, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the case of Williams v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
This morning, the Court issued an order list from last week’s Conference that included grants of certiorari, denials of certiorari, and an invitation for the Acting Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States (CVSG), as well as several “GVR” (grant, vacate, and remand) orders. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:10 pm
(Disclosure: Howe & Russell co-represents petitioner Jimenez). [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
In the United State Supreme Court, the State’s counsel, Joesph Maziarz, placed great emphasis on the fact that Belton was settled precedent and the need for a clear, bright-line rule. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm
On October 15, 2013, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review six of the nine submitted petitions stemming from an appellate court ruling upholding Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) greenhouse gas (“GHG”) controls at utilities, factories and other facilities around the country. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:59 pm
On September 1, 2011, the parents obtained a United States passport for I.S.A. based upon her father's United States citizenship. [read post]
