Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 3141 - 3160 of 9,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am by Thomas Merrill
  PPL and the United States (which has filed a brief on the merits supporting PPL) rely heavily on United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
As expected, Ford removed to United States District Court for Pennsylvania under CAFA. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:00 am by Ortiz Law Firm
Viso then filed a lawsuit for breach of contract, bad faith, and intentional infliction of emotional distress in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:48 am by Mark Hartsoe
The Federal District Court’s Decision Following a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga denied the defendant’s motion. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:48 am by Mark Hartsoe
The Federal District Court’s Decision Following a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga denied the defendant’s motion. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:48 am by Mark Hartsoe
The Federal District Court’s Decision Following a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga denied the defendant’s motion. [read post]