Search for: "Vice v State" Results 3141 - 3160 of 4,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Lewis, 534 A.2d 720, 722 (N.H. 1987) (patient waives physician-patient privilege to relevant information by putting medical condition at issue); State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:06 pm by Cory Doctorow
Software patenting went into high gear around 1994 and consistently gained speed until 2014, when Alice v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:16 am by William Ford
Masanori Yoshida (Ret.), Vice Adm. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 7:50 am
Certification marks have been available at a national level in some member states (e.g. the UK, Germany) for a while, but the lack of EU-wide marks has led to inconsistent certification regimes/standards, and geographical gaps in certification. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
VC Laster’s Transcript Ruling in Gerlanc v Beatrice A recent transcript ruling by Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery in Gerlanc v Beatrice, CA No. 2017-0211-JTL (Mar. 23, 2017), reaches the opposite result on similar facts due to key differences in Delaware’s LLC Act. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
VC Laster’s Transcript Ruling in Gerlanc v Beatrice A recent transcript ruling by Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery in Gerlanc v Beatrice, CA No. 2017-0211-JTL (Mar. 23, 2017), reaches the opposite result on similar facts due to key differences in Delaware’s LLC Act. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Beginning with the landmark 1938 decision in Erie v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
It almost sounds like a case the 11th Circuit reversed, U.S. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:58 am by fjhinojosa
: The Applicability of State Anti-SLAPP Statutes in Federal Court and the Need for Federal Protection Against SLAPPs, 70 Cath. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:26 am by Steve Hall
” On Tuesday the state of Texas decided for the tenth time to exercise the discretion allowed by the Atkins v Virginia ruling to examine claims of mental impairment to determine for itself a death row inmate’s degree of capacity, and it executed Marvin Wilson. [read post]