Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 3161 - 3180 of 16,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Since the proposed claims in defendant’s third amended complaint are insufficient as a matter of law (Cross beat NY v Liirn, 169 AD3d 604 [1st Dept 2019]), the motion to amend the answer is denied. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 11:16 am by Andrew Delaney
This puppy has nothing to do with the caseState v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm by Linda McClain
A survey released in 2017, on the 50th anniversary of Loving, found that one in six new marriages in the United States crosses racial or ethnic lines, although the white-black line is crossed less frequently than other lines, such as white-Asian, white-Latinx, or other combinations. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Kristian Soltes
As a result, indirect purchaser class actions in the United States often are not certified for class treatment under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) or comparable class action rules in state courts. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
”[1] Did Judge Milazzo engage in judicial dodging with rejecting the relevancy argument and emphasizing the truism that Sanofi could highlight the discrepancy on cross-examination? [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
If the latter, then this may be contrasted with the approach taken by Pumfrey J in Abbott v Ranbaxy [2004] where he stated that had he not granted summary judgment on validity grounds, he would have granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 8:05 am by Marcia Coyle
The Supreme Court created the doctrine of qualified immunity in a 1967 decision in the case Pierson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:12 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Cross-examination by defense — Impeachment Appellant, Donovan Faust, was convicted by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, of murder in the first degree; use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence; possession of a regulated firearm after previously having been convicted of a crime of ... [read post]