Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 11,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2008, 10:00 pm
The relatively recent English decision of Esterhuizen v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 8:14 pm
The Act of 1956 substantially incorporates provisions of the English Companies Act, 1948. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:15 pm
The petition of the day is: Kerestes v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 8:26 am
The issue, co-edited by Véronica Ruiz Abou-Nigm and María Mercedes Albornoz, is based on contributions to a panel at the 15th conference of ASADIP in Asunción, Paraguay (2022), and contains some articles in Spanish, some in English. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 10:01 am
The children speak English, but not Hebrew. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:21 pm
While I dearly wish that "Monkey v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
” The Judge analysed the assertions made in her letter and concluded that Ms Romanova;s language difficulties did not comprise a significant obstacle, noting that she was an educated woman who was a Professor of Journalism and had “positively asserted an ability to read and write the English language” and, in her own witness statement (in support of her application to set aside service) “indicated a relatively high level of skill in English”. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 10:17 pm
Mortgage Bankers Association v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 2:15 am
Its claim (authorised by the Charity Commission) was based upon seeking court approval for the making of a grant of US$360m to another English charity, Big Win Philanthropy (“BWP”). [read post]
29 May 2007, 11:45 am
He learned English and is active in his church and in his community. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:50 pm
Lyle reported on the decision for this blog, and Amy Howe covered the decision for us in Plain English. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 3:09 am
In an appeal to the JCPC that involves an issue of English law on which a previous decision of the House of Lords, Supreme Court or Court of Appeal is challenged, the members of the JCPC can, if they think it appropriate, not only decide that the previous decision was wrong, but also can expressly direct that domestic courts should treat their decision as representing the law of England and Wales. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
(v) If any evidence of fact is to be introduced, the court will need to be satisfied of its relevance. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
(v) If any evidence of fact is to be introduced, the court will need to be satisfied of its relevance. [read post]
17 May 2015, 3:52 pm
Zabala v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:29 am
In Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ICSOP) v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:31 pm
In New Jersey v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
” Bartnicki v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[1]United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:16 am
By Eric Goldman Novins v. [read post]
