Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 9,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2007, 1:01 pm
In 1991, the Court held in Peretz v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 1:13 am
In Jonathan Smyth v St Andrew's Insurance plc [2012] EWHC 2511 (QB) Mr John Randall QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) held that defendant insurers (St Andrew's) had failed to establish that the claimant's (Smyth) partner had deliberately started a fire which had caused extensive damage to Smyth's property, and thus St Andrews could not avail itself of a clause in the relevant insurance policy which excluded damage caused by Smyth's "family".The… [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:08 pm
Last week, Cherokee Nation District Court Judge John Cripps issued a decision (here) in the case of Nash v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
Schwartz is a talented scientist with whom I had the privilege and pleasure to work at McCarter & English, before he left to become an independent scientific consultant. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
This was confirmed in the case of Douglas & ors v Hello! [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 4:15 pm
’ Comment This decision, for which ANL was refused permission to appeal to the Supreme Court, did not address the issue of the legal recognition of image rights in English law. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 5:54 am
Cantu v Texas, Tex. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 2:29 pm
Putting it into English, this translates to roughly: “No, KBR. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 5:59 am
We are following it under the heading Elektra v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
"Paki-bashing" was a term that entered the English language during his teems, along with "aggro" and "skinhead". [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm
Furthermore, the court held that Australian Leather’s reliance on the doctrine of foreign equivalents was misplaced, stating that the doctrine is generally used to analyze non-English terms used in the American marketplace, rather than English-to-English comparisons. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:38 am
Will the position ultimately be governed by ordinary English law rules for breaches of statutory duty where there is no sufficiently serious requirement? [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:52 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 6:06 pm
"BFP v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:17 am
The trustees therefore sought to wind up OA in the English courts in order to gain this protection. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 9:01 am
For starters, there is no doubt, based on a reading of Securicor and the rich jurisprudence of the English courts on the issue of contractual interpretation (the latest addition to which is Campbell v Daejan Properties), that when interpreting a contract the intention of the parties reign supreme, and blanket rules are to be avoided. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 2:27 pm
Especially with regard to the Copyright and Rights in Performances (Quotation and Parody) Regulations 2014, which will enter into force in October 2014, thereby introducing the parody exception into English copyright law, an English note on the AG’s opinion seems valuable. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
However, despite the fact that we are so far away, Australia's legal system seems very familiar to the English having derived from our common law system. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:44 pm
FND countered by arguing that the English courts had jurisdiction under the following three Articles of the Brussels I Regulation: Article 5(3); Article 23(1)(b); and, Article 24. [read post]
