Search for: "European Patent Office" Results 3161 - 3180 of 4,481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2011, 8:19 am
Copyright Office may come, Directors may go -- but the new Register of Copyrights Maria A. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:58 am
The boards are independent from the Office in their decisions and are bound only by the European Patent Convention (EPC) [Aren't we all, ponders Merpel ...]. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:15 pm by Stephen Jenei
European Patent Office Denies WARF’s Stem Cell Patent Vatican Supports Adult Stem Cell Research [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:36 am by Rachael Vaughn
Patent practitioners who withhold information about best mode may still be sanctioned by the Office of Enrollment and Discipline, but the new law has effectively removed the teeth of the best mode monster and locked it in a cage. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am by Melina Padron
34/10) in which it banned the issuing of patents for stem cells on ethical grounds. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
Note for patent-and-standards addicts. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:26 pm by Falk Metzler
What can be learned from this example is that the potential Members of the new Court, i.e. legal and technical judges of well-respected national patent courts will have their say - and many of those potetial Members will definitely come from Munich, especially from the Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht) and the EPO Boards of Appeal, since the new Unified EU Patent Court will be competent for both the European patent according to the EPC and the… [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 8:06 pm by Lawrence Higgins
[Link] Patent Jobs King & Spalding is searching for a patent attorney with 1-2 years of experience to work at their Houston office. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:42 am by RatnerPrestia
It also represents clients in essentially all courts and patent and trademark offices. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A European Union directive banning the patenting of inventions whose commercialization violates public order or "morality" has been used to invalidate a patent involving human embryonic stem cells. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:20 pm by California Stem Cell Report
The California stem cell agency today posted a blog item on the European court decision outlawing patents on products created from human embryonic stem cells that basically painted a bleak picture for the field. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:15 am by Sam Favate
Patent attorneys in the U.S. must pass a separate bar exam, as required by the Patent and Trademark Office, and usually have additional degrees in engineering or computer science. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post-Grant) New Mexico politicians lobby for satellite patent office (IPBiz)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Bosch v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 9:55 pm by Patent Docs
Patent and Trademark Office and Federal Circuit Bar Association) - Tokyo, Japan October 25-26, 2011 -... [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 11:30 am by Lawrence Higgins
Where Will the Patent Satellite Offices Open! [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:40 am by Dennis Crouch
In a recent post, Michael Thesen wrote about the ongoing patent litigation between Samsung and Apple – with a focus on a German preliminary injunction based upon a European Design Registration. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 9:32 pm by Patent Docs
Currently the USPTO has PPH programs (full or pilot) in place with the Japan Patent Office (JPO), the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO), the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), IP Australia (IP AU), the European Patent Office (EPO), the Danish Patent and Trademark Office (DKPTO), the Intellectual Property Office of… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:17 am
The European Patent Office has issued a notice revising its practice when conducting International Preliminary Examination (IPE) for PCT applications. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The applicant or his representative must plausibly show that a normally effective system for monitoring time limits prescribed by the EPC was established at the relevant time in the office in question (see references in “Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office, 6th edition 2010”, VI.E.7.3.3 a)). [5] In the present case, it has not been shown that the applicant had such a satisfactory system in place. [read post]