Search for: "FISH v. STATE" Results 3161 - 3180 of 3,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2010, 6:32 am by David G. Badertscher
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run September 26,2010.To retrieve the text of any of the New York Chapter laws listed below, go to http://public.leginfo.state.ny.us/menuf.cgiChapter Bill No. 483 A924E DelMonte (MS) -- Authorizes the department of environmental conservation to promulgate standards authorizing hunting with a crossbow; repealer BLURB : En Con L. hunting w/crossbow Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 483 09/17/2010 takes effect 10/1/2010, except that… [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The Fifth Circuit—after consulting the Supreme Court's "delphic" ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 10:49 am
So, clearly, Russia's WTO accession is an economic no-brainer for the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
     At the hearing, the United States requested that the court issue an award to the whistleblower whose information led to the conviction of the defendants. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:23 am by admin
  Fishing for a definition   The outcome will determine whether federal maritime or state laws apply to structures that are moored, more or less permanently, in one place. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:59 pm by Stan
in reply to imagethief -> Latest China Hearsay: Apple CEO Meets With China’s Vice Premier: A Guide http://t.co/oAbpdTIF -> King & Wood: New Law on Prevention and Treatment of Occupational Diseases Strengthens the Protection for Employees http://t.co/FN6d4DFp -> Clifford Chance: FCPA: Facilitating Payments v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 5:30 am by Gus Hurwitz
Steve Salop and Jennifer Sturiale have an interesting piece arguing, in light of West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm by Ken White
That view is strengthened by the steady progress of the law since 2012 in cases like Cox v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:32 am by Laura Jehl and Stephanie Malaska
While the order concluded that the summons satisfied a “legitimate purpose” and (mostly) sought “information relevant to that purpose” under the Powell test (United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 8:48 am
But we on the defense side have a lot more going for us in federal court than we did in state court. [read post]