Search for: "Generics International (US) Inc" Results 3161 - 3180 of 9,123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2017, 8:15 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The easy-to-use website was created to promote transparency in government and provide taxpayers with better access to financial data. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:06 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Generally, MHPAEA requires that the financial requirements and treatment limitations imposed on mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) benefits cannot be more restrictive than the predominant financial requirements and treatment limitations that apply to substantially all medical and surgical benefits. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
The court determines that the plaintiffs “fall within the zone of interests protected by the law invoked,” per Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
’” Finally, in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Lexmark International, Inc.; another episode focuses on racial-gerrymandering case Cooper v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 3:27 am
Lippman; Beachcombers International v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm by daniel
International tech company Garmin, Inc. is also fighting back and seeking fees. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Laroe Estates, Inc., the justices ruled that an as-of-right intervenor must have standing if it is seeking relief not requested by a plaintiff in the case. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:29 pm by Matthew D. Lee
This scheme enabled the U.S. corrupt clients to evade reporting requirements to the IRS by concealing the proceeds generated by the manipulated stock transactions through the shell companies and their nominees. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Please let us know if there are any media and law events which you would like us to list. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by Robin Shea
A federal judge in California ruled that Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., was not an “employer” of its subfranchisees and also had not engaged in any wrongdoing with respect to the subfranchisees. [read post]