Search for: "Herring v. State"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 58,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2020, 10:29 am
Richards v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
"In addition, said the court, quoting Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70 AD3d 1110, while "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it", the Village in this instance offered Jakubowicz a hearing "to afford [him] the opportunity to present information to the Village why [he] should not be administratively… [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
"In addition, said the court, quoting Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70 AD3d 1110, while "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it", the Village in this instance offered Jakubowicz a hearing "to afford [him] the opportunity to present information to the Village why [he] should not be administratively… [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
" In addition, said the court, quoting Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70 AD3d 1110, while "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it", the Village in this instance offered Jakubowicz a hearing "to afford [him] the opportunity to present information to the Village why [he] should not be administratively terminated… [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
" In addition, said the court, quoting Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70 AD3d 1110, while "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it", the Village in this instance offered Jakubowicz a hearing "to afford [him] the opportunity to present information to the Village why [he] should not be administratively terminated… [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:51 am
In Dejesus, Plaintiff alleged in her complaint that she worked more than forty hours per week during “some or all weeks” of her employment, but that she was not properly compensated for her alleged overtime hours. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:35 pm
That way a sponsor can't bring someone into the United States, abandon them, and then burden the state with his support. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm
Kagan writes, in the opening lines of her dissent: "A Christian, a Jew, a Muslim (and so forth)—each stands in the same relationship with her country, with her state and local communities, and with every level and body of govern ment. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:10 am
In Pacchiana v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
In the case of R (Ingenious Media) v HMRC ([2016] UKSC 54) UK Supreme Court held that information provided by taxpayers to HMRC is confidential and that HMRC acted unlawfully by disclosing such information to journalists. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently issued its decision in Young v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:22 am
” Simcox v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:35 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:08 am
Next to the photo, it states: `Need a blow job? [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
In Bowers v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:54 am
Relying on Armendariz v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am
Ginsburg did not comment on each professor’s answers to her question. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
There were no children of the marriage, but the wife had a daughter by her first marriage, now aged 15. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:58 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of McMahan v. [read post]
