Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 3161 - 3180 of 7,664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
You're not the only one  ...After earlier posts on the issue here and here, Merpel returns to the EPO strike, this time recounting the tale of an EPO Board of Appeal member who had just been suspended from office and escorted from the building. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 5:14 am by SHG
  Even if the cops are shooting at the bad dude, and we’re merely walking by, wholly unrelated and unaware, and the bullet misses its mark as they so often do, and strikes us down, we are just as dead as if we were its intended target. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 12:00 am
We’re fouling the nest that sustains us. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:53 am by Ronald Mann
This is a case where I’m inclined to accept the approach Edward Lee has been pressing at ISCOTUSnow – that the party that gets the fewest questions is most likely to prevail. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 11:48 pm by Jeff Nowak
The Facts Mark worked in the parts department for Utility Trailers, and during one of his shifts in late March 2010, he fell off a ladder, re-aggravating a preexisting back injury. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
Like her, though for different reasons set out in my original post, I’m lukewarm about this move. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
"  Imagine, for example, Motorola using its registration of its word mark to argue that it could use McDonald's golden arch for its M. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:58 am by SHG
In other words: “I’m Larry Bird. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am by Ronald Mann
Eventually, the Board refused to cancel B&B’s mark or to register the Hargis mark, concluding that the Hargis mark was so similar to the long-registered B&B mark that it would cause confusion. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 5:04 am
  In the context of express preemption—as opposed to the mélange of implied preemption—voluntariness can mean no preemption. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:27 pm by Colin O'Keefe
I’m sure at least a couple of LexBlog’s account managers have been asked that question in the last couple days. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 8:21 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
If you’re browsing lists of extenders, be forewarned: there are a number of bills under consideration and they’re not all created equal. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 6:14 am
Mark Family Church, said if the grand jury does not indict Wilson, “I think [the community] will feel like it’s open season on young black men. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:40 am by Jeff Gamso
 Her jumping off point is an article written by Mark Bennett (federal judge Mark Bennett, not Houston criminal defense/first-amendment lawyer Mark Bennett) which mentions that the good work of trial lawyers has resulted, among other things, in “hundreds of thousands of lives have been spared from tobacco-related deaths and billions have been saved in health care costs. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 5:44 am by Mark Tushnet
 You want your successor to be as much like you as possible (if you're a conservative, just as conservative -- but no more conservative -- than you are, if you're a liberal, just as liberal -- but no more liberal -- than you are.) [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 12:17 am by Tessa Shepperson
CEO of Circle Housing Mark Rogers said: “This research shows there are no easy answers for policy makers. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:05 am
* Toy marks under scrutiny: is there a rift between OHIM Appeal Boards? [read post]