Search for: "M. B.1."
Results 3161 - 3180
of 13,694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2019, 2:10 pm
Ha estado en la práctica por más de 10 años y ha juzgado más de 100 casos. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm
Near the end of its decision, the Court referred to the argument B’Nai Brith, an intervenor, made that the SCI was justified on the “liberty” argument, that it allowed students choice about the activies and services it wanted to support. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
” Article 1(b)(i) excludes from the definition munitions “which may have incidental incendiary effects, such as illuminants, tracers, smoke or signalling [sic] systems. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:39 am
Now you know I’m not the fuckin’ bitch. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:36 am
The following are options to explore: 1. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:08 am
Wanton misconduct by Officer Dudley would mean the political subdivision could be liable under R.C. 2744.02(B)(1)(a). [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 12:24 pm
P. 1.280(b)(1) that parties are entitled to “discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action,” and that “[i]t is not ground for objection that the information sought will be inadmissible at the trial if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
In addition to the populations of Bikini and Enewetak, the people of Rongelap and Utirik were also affected by radioactive fallout from the largest nuclear test the United States has ever conducted, the Bravo test held March 1, 1954. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:58 am
[1] 2019 QCCA 1669. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:51 am
In addition to updating rates for physician services, the final rule revises numerous other Medicare Part B policies. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
Just Answer the Questions Already… 1) Can the state proceed on the original indictment? [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
” So if Congress had tasked the president, just as the earlier King had tasked the Earl of M., with executing a task—say, providing military aid to an ally—but the president refused to do that until he had received something of personal value in return, the precedent at the time of the Founding would have been impeachment. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Cerminara, Today's Crusades: A Therapeutic Jurisprudential Critique of Faith-Based Civil Rights in Health Care, (October 1, 2019).Cecilia M. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 7:33 am
I’m not entirely sure on what basis the difference with leasehold cases like Earle v Charalambous (our note) is made out. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:10 am
The consultancy company, as a data controller, is therefore subject to the GDPR in respect of the processing of this data for this purpose as per its Article 3(2)(b). [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 8:30 am
P. 12(b)(2), for lack of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 8:31 am
Notable Events of the Week: “As public hearings began, William B. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 4:36 pm
Under s.33(1) of the Act, it is an offence to ‘disclose a private sexual photograph or film if the disclosure is made (a) without the consent of the individual who appears and (b) with the intention of causing that individual distress. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:20 am
Here is a hypothetical to test the idea: 1. [read post]
