Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 8,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
Disclaimers inserted during examining proceedings also create presumptions concerning the exclaimed subject-matter, as the appellant in the present case had to find out.The patent proprietor appealed against the decision of the Opposition Division to revoke the patent under consideration.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation; the differences with respect to claim 1 as granted are emphasized):Crop protection composition, formulated as powder, granules or… [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:40 am
As this Court noted in The Florida Bar v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:49 am
[w]e decide merely that . . . review by the full court is not justified. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In today’s Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
An attorney is liable under Judiciary Law § 487(1) if he or she “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party,” and under Judiciary Law § 487(2) if he or she “[w]illfully delays his [or her] client’s suit with a view to his [or her] own gain” (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 12; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838). [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm
G.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 4:02 am
Patent Nos. 5,447,432, 5,683,243, 6,244,861, 6,398,548 and 6,616,444); "[i]t is a bedrock principle of patent law that the claims of a patent define the invention to which the patentee is entitled the right to exclude"; "[w]hen the application of prosecution disclaimer involves statements from prosecution of a familial patent relating to the same subject matter as the claim language at issue in the patent being construed, those statements in the familial application… [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:35 am
This case of Westfield v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:20 pm
” Paul W. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm
Ward [v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:19 pm
In last month’s decision in Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Norfolk & W. [read post]
King Comeoniwannalayya Hooks Up With Resort Staff and Sends Their Case Back to Hawaiian State Court.
24 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Smith v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
See Boyd v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Wheelahan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:20 am
[w]hat one purchaser may rely upon in entering into a contract may not be material to another purchaser”) First District Court of Appeal Davis v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
With October finished, baseball is over, basketball is meaningless, and college football won’t really matter for at least another month. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Tallent v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:58 pm
[W]e exercise our discretion not to proceed to the question of infringement as a matter of law. [read post]
