Search for: "MATTER OF D S N" Results 3161 - 3180 of 5,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2015, 7:44 am by Andrew Frisch
There shall be no communications with any named Plaintiff or with any current or future opt-in Plaintiffs outside the formal discovery process or without the consent of the named Plaintiff’s counsel of record, except-as to any currently employed present or future opt-in Plaintiff-for routine business matters unrelated to this action. [read post]
 Finally, the District Court remarked that it would not decline jurisdiction in the interest of justice, rather it would wait for the records to develop to ascertain as a matter of fact if the defendant Rick’s NY Cabaret International, Inc. was indeed the primary defendant. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
The patent issue in NeuroRepair’s suit is not “substantial”; and D. if cases such as NeuroRepair’s were heard in federal court, it would disrupt the federal-state balance].Id. at *2 (text added). [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 7:28 pm by JP Sarmiento
The landmark immigration case that discusses the standards for NIWs is Matter of New York State Department of Transportation, 22 I&N Dec. 215 (Comm.1998). [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 6:09 am
Ct. at 904 n.3 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 1:51 pm by Andrew Frisch
Finally, SFBSC has “agree[d] that that the public disclosure of an exotic dancer’s true identity presents substantial risk of harm. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Sarah Sutherland
Canada (Procureur général), 2015 CSC 5 [1] Au Canada, le fait d’aider une personne à mettre fin à ses jours constitue un crime. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Radiance (Nat’l Ass’n for Abortion of Colored People). [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:52 pm by Dennis Crouch
”[4]  But the PTAB almost never grants these motions to amend.[5]  Thus, as a practical matter, the agency’s basis for adopting “broadest reasonable interpretation” is illusory. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm by Schachtman
Despite Greenland’s alignment with California in the Denton case, the fact of the matter is that a verdict of “uncertain” was allowed, and he was free to criticize California for making a grossly exaggerated epistemic claim on inconclusive evidence. [read post]