Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 3161 - 3180
of 21,684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2021, 8:13 am
Jones v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 7:52 am
Jennifer Bridges v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 8:06 pm
However, this still comprised part of the factual matrix of the case, and the judge stated, [55] Constable Letkeman’s act of causing this first collision was dangerous under all the circumstances and a marked departure from the standard expected. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 12:13 pm
LLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm
Amant v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:51 am
GermanyProtester v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Activists are exasperated that members of Congress and President Biden have not been able to push through federal legislation that would supersede the voting laws moving through state Legislatures across the country. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:18 pm
S. 133, 136 (1955); see United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:36 pm
The ruling in Chrysafis v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Cotter, Nominal Damages—and Nominal Damages Workarounds—in Intellectual Property Law TransUnion v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:00 am
Who cares if the Supreme Court forced the NCAA’s hands in Alston v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 9:12 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:31 am
Case date: 19 May 2021 Case number: No. 20-30233 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:57 am
Yesterday's announcement of the Open App Markets Act proposal by a bipartisan group of United States Senators marks a tipping point. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:26 am
The long-running saga of Bayer v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division stated that it had consistently recognized that "the Board may adopt reasonable rules consistent with and supplemental to the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law, and the Chair of the Board may make reasonable regulations consistent with the provisions thereof" (Matter of Randell v Christie's Inc., 183 AD3d 1057, 1059 [2020] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted].Those regulations require, in relevant part, that… [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division stated that it had consistently recognized that "the Board may adopt reasonable rules consistent with and supplemental to the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law, and the Chair of the Board may make reasonable regulations consistent with the provisions thereof" (Matter of Randell v Christie's Inc., 183 AD3d 1057, 1059 [2020] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted].Those regulations require, in relevant part, that… [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:06 pm
The appellate judges considered the United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Linford: do we think of certain types of marks as innovative? [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 11:48 am
Pulte v. [read post]
