Search for: "Root v. State" Results 3161 - 3180 of 4,649
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
Root of Reason discusses Monday’s decision in McBurney v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:08 am by Marissa Miller
Jurist’s Julia Zebley reviews last week’s oral arguments in Metrish v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
[v] South Dakota: American indigenous peoples comprise 27 percent of the South Dakota prison population, the highest proportion of any state in the country. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 4:46 am by Kenneth Kan
In continuing with the series on total loss, this week I direct my attention to Pennsylvania, the “Keystone State. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
Brown & Root, Inc., 207 F.3d 717 (4th Cir. 2000); Brown & Kerr Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Leading scholars will offer brief reflections on the long history of black freedom movements, their significance to United States history more generally, and their relevance for today. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:49 pm by Terry Hart
For some writers, the choice is put in even more loaded terms: either you side with those who are rooted in the past or line up with the vanguard of the future, freed of entangling rights.5 But copyright is not a zero sum game. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by Dianne Saxe
In Clean Train Coalition Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:31 am by Susan L. Nardone
The EEOC will use individual complaints as a basis for conducting a more widespread investigation of the company involved to root out other potential problems. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm by Emma Durand-Wood
At the BC Employment Lawyer Blog, Daniel Sorensen of Waterstone Law Group wrote about the ramifications of a recent human rights tribunal decision, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP v. [read post]