Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 3161 - 3180
of 23,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
Important case on breaches of contract for implementation of SAP Atos v Sapient, 2016 ONSC 6852 https://t.co/5lvFIvUMhc -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-12-07 https://t.co/k7IJ4icMcK -> Limitations of liability in IT contracts: Atos v Sapient | Barry Sookman https://t.co/qQEN5yQ91X -> Limitations of liability in IT contracts: Atos v Sapient https://t.co/ygmIqxQttL -> US Congress seeks small claims track for copyright claims https://t.co/gA7qZnUbRh… [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:39 pm
As of November 1, 2017, Eleanor Licensing entered a license agreement with T&D Motor and Classic Recreations granting T&D Motor and Classic Recreations the right to use intellectual property rights, trademarks and copyrightable material relating to “Gone in 60 Seconds” and “Eleanor” to manufacture and sell 300 restored 1971, 1972 and 1973 Fastback Ford Mustangs fitted and detailed to replicate in appearance the 1974 Eleanor and 1,000 restored 1967 and 1968… [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 12:08 pm
” In this action, plaintiffs sued defendant Anheuser Busch Inbev Worldwide, Inc. and other companies that sell or distribute beverages containers in California . . . . [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 8:49 am
Filed: October 29, 2015Opinion by: Graeff, J.Holdings: (1) The common-law fiduciary duties of candor and maximization of shareholder value articulated in Shenker v. [read post]
DMCA Safe Harbor Doesn’t Protect Zazzle’s Printing of Physical Items–Greg Young Publishing v. Zazzle
28 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Calcagni * Griper Selling Anti-Walmart Items Through CafePress Doesn’t Infringe or Dilute–Smith v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:07 pm
("Quanta v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
The court implies that Redbubble sells goods that don’t exist until ordered and the packages come slathered with Redbubble branding. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:54 pm
We had held in Bridenbaugh v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 1:25 pm
As KJK has previously covered, earlier this year, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) delivered a landmark ruling on the reach of the protections afforded by the Clean Water Act (CWA) in Sacket v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 7:32 am
The post More Perspectives About Van Buren v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:04 pm
In T.H. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:30 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 11:40 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:43 am
In National Builders & Contractors Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 8:04 am
JA Apparel Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 12:39 pm
., have value because they let you keep playing the game.Importantly, the panel holds that this is gambling not because some people sell these chips on a secondary market (e.g., the chips have "actual" cash value). [read post]
2 May 2013, 12:45 pm
But he didn't sell it from his office like you'd normally think. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:32 pm
It primarily argued that the doctrine of strict products liability, as well as any similar tort theory, did not apply to it because it did not distribute, manufacture, or sell the product in question. [read post]
