Search for: "Smith v. Judges" Results 3161 - 3180 of 5,944
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm by David Cheifetz
Justice Smith, writing for the majority, in Sam v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:40 am by Shearil Matthews
Judge James Ho concurred, and Judges Edith Jones, Jerry Smith, and Andrew Oldham concurred with the judgment only. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:32 pm by Phil Dixon
Louisiana, as it does not retroactively apply to cases on collateral review Smith v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm by Bexis
  Indeed, Dukes might not have been as damaging to multi-jurisdictional class actions as the Court’s other recent opinion in Smith v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 8:26 am
" The primary development is likely the Supreme Court's 2007 decision three months later in Smith v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc., 292 F.3d 1334, 1339 (11th Cir. 2002), abrogated on other grounds by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 6:16 am
Justice Souter so wrote for the Court despite the fact that in an earlier case, Smith v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:31 am by Susan Brenner
Both Mar[ch]etta and Smith were acting as screeners of drivers. . . . [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 7:23 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Absent the identification of an extricable error of law or a palpable and overriding factual error, an appellate court will defer to the motion judge’s assessment: Housen v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Abercrombie & Fitch (2015), which increased the protection given to a Muslim wearing a head scarf; and Smith v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 4:37 pm by Steve Sady
The briefing in this area can be adapted from several sources, including the Divens opinion, Ninth Circuit Judge Milan Smith’s partial dissent in Johnson, and the NACDL amicus brief in support of rehearing in Johnson. [read post]