Search for: "State v. E. F." Results 3161 - 3180 of 8,844
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2017, 8:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
(c) The communication furthermore announced that, should the applicant ask for a decision on the state of the file without filing further requests, amendments or comments, the application would then be refused "based on the above arguments taken in combination with the arguments provided in the summons" (see communication B, point 3).V. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am by Schachtman
In the coordinated California state court talc cases, Judge Maren E. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:31 pm by Ronald Mann
In a rare moment for the Roberts Court, the opinion in Star Athletica v Varsity Brands addressed that question broadly and categorically, passing up every opportunity to narrow or confine its ruling. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 10:55 am by Miriam Seifter
But if Lots E and F together constitute the denominator, it seems clear that no taking has occurred. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
  Under Section 2.3 of Executive Order 12333 (reinforced by Section 3.2), “[e]lements of the Intelligence Community are authorized to collect, retain, or disseminate information concerning United States persons only in accordance with procedures established by the head of the Intelligence Community element concerned or by the head of a department containing such element and approved by the Attorney General . . . after consultation with” the DNI. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 4:56 am by Matthias Weller
Szirány further explained that it is of interest to the EU to align and coordinate the insolvency exception in the future Hague Judgments Convention with EU legislation, see Article 2 No. 1 lit. e covering “insolvency, composition and analogous matters” of the 2016 Preliminary Draft Convention. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In a scathing decision in Abdulaali v Salih, he stated, 1. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
United States (2005) 546 U.S. 12, 17–18; see also Bowles v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 5:24 pm by INFORRM
One could try to make the argument in the wake of Google v Vuitton that a search engine or a (natural) referencing service provider is a hosting provider and therefore should be able to avail itself of Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive [although what a search engine is doing is maybe more caching than hosting]. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 10:52 am by Charlotte Garden
As a result, Water Splash sued Menon in Texas state court, serving her at her residence in Quebec by certified mail, return receipt requested; first class mail; Federal Express; and e-mail. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:01 pm by Bill Marler
” 1996: Researchers at South Dakota State University publish a study showing that 60-day aging is largely ineffectual in reducing levels of E. coli O157:H7 in cheddar cheese. [read post]