Search for: "UPS, Inc."
Results 3161 - 3180
of 43,773
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
GuideStar USA, Inc. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:57 am
Google, Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 11:03 am
Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 7:22 am
In Crocs, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
When U.com, Inc., 293 F.Supp.2d 734 (E.D.Mich.2003) (holding no likelihood of confusion for pop-up advertisements for non-Wells Fargo vendors displayed in response to “Wells Fargo” keyword); U–Haul Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:26 am
Learn more and sign up for a free trial account by visiting http://www.netdockets.com/. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:40 pm
" A round-up of some of the Imperial Holdings IPO stories - and a criticism of some inaccuracies that appear in those articles - is here. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:00 pm
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:34 am
Both the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation, Inc. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:24 am
In each case, DFine paid physicians up to $500 per patient to participate in the survey. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:52 am
Kessel and Pettijohn each face up to eight years in prison and a fine of up to $500,000.00. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:00 am
Herr Foods Inc. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 11:40 am
by Dennis Kiker - Director, Professional Services, Fios, Inc. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 8:28 pm
Yesterday, five related utilities - Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc., and Entergy Texas, Inc. - filed a notice of appeal from Judge Douglas O. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm
The appellate court noted that the tort (termination of plaintiff's employment in retaliation for complaints of workplace discrimination) was apparently part of a pattern of corporate conduct, but (1) the conduct reflected a "moderate level of reprehensibility; (2) the tort did not result in physical injury; (3) the punitive award was on top of a "substantial" compensatory award; and (4) the punitive damages far exceeded a potential statutory fine of up to $250,000 for… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:20 am
Chalk one up for another satisfied O.C. customer.P.S. - There's a companion case today that has more of the facts, as well as an interesting discussion about why the trial court should have granted terminating sanctions against the defendant (!). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am
Today’s second argument is in Digital Realty Trust Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 3:05 am
Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., No. 04 C 5312, Slip Op. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:10 pm
In the company's preliminary prospectus, Imperial Holdings, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 6:41 am
See Healthcare Advocates, Inc. v. [read post]
