Search for: "United States v. Lively" Results 3161 - 3180 of 11,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2019, 11:00 pm by Mary Mock
In the 1930s, waves of Jewish and Catholic immigrants arrived in the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 10:15 am by Mark Ashton
It may have been a magical time to create the United States and its founding freedoms but few of us harken to renew much of that legal precedent today. [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:46 am
The case involves Khaled El-Masri, who lives near Neu Ulm, Germany. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
Grant may continue to litigate his wrongful-death lawsuitNURSING HOME MORTGAGOR CHEATED HUD ON LOANS; SUIT SEEKS $77 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am by Kevin Johnson
Holder, the United States seeks to remove from the United States a lawful permanent resident who has lived here since 1974, because he was convicted of voluntary manslaughter in 1989. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
Sanchez Valle, describing it as an “explosive” filing that “has inexplicably undermined nearly 70 years of the United States’ legal and political commitment about the status of Puerto Rico and the right of the people there to local self-government. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:44 pm by Amy Howe
On the same day that the Court issued its ruling in the California case, it also issued its opinion in a case called United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am by cassieq
Ruiz, Jr. was the first Hispanic attorney to argue before the United States Supreme Court in Buck v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Government’s argument: No one seemed all that happy with the United States’ official immunit [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]