Search for: "-JS SENIOR v. PAGE"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
Provident Funding Associates, L.P. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:27 am
The National Anthem Bill runs 23 pages (and follows in full below). [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s the judgment of the FCA: York University v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:07 pm
Michael Douglas, Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Western Australia This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am
The executive branch believes that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) does not apply to otherwise-authorized, military cyber activity, and the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision on the CFAA in Van Buren v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
The “alternative” model that the Defense Department must address, per Section 540F is simply whether that decision-making authority should lie solely with an independent senior judge advocate outside the chain of command. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:53 am
Hallman v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:11 pm
The judges there also took turns asking questions by seniority. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 7:47 am
Going to criminal court for the first time in OntarioGoing to criminal court for the first time is confusing and intimidating. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
Democratic National Committee (DNC), ran fewer than four pages, the 5-4 ruling has engendered a great deal of commentary and criticism about what the justices did. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 12:51 am
Both I and other senior judges are happy to receive representations about the best method of proceeding in the current climate. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:21 pm
For more legal insights visit our Coronavirus (COVID-19) page. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm
The Supreme Court will hear the libel appeal in Serafin v. [read post]