Search for: "ATES V. STATE"
Results 301 - 320
of 859
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2014, 6:50 am
Ben noted Diane Webber’s account of the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in Hassan v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:57 am
Nigel Tait of Carter-Ruck acted on a defendant CFA along with After the Events Insurance (ATE). [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 12:42 pm
In particular, there already appears to be a circuit split between the 9th and 11th circuits regarding whether the Supreme Court intended lower courts to apply to ATS cases the “focus” test in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Baloco v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
First, the court reaffirmed a prior holding that ATS jurisdiction was appropriate even under the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:13 pm
In Belhas v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:56 am
Araquistain v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:33 am
The companies argued that the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:05 am
In Doe I v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 3:42 am
NOVEMBER 13: Fair Labor Standards Act Sandifer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:44 am
(The Ninth Circuit reached a similar conclusion in the Doe v. [read post]
Second Circuit Affirms Official Acts Immunity for Pakistani ISI Chiefs; Rejects Jus Cogens Exception
29 Aug 2014, 11:28 am
The issue will continue to be debated amongst international lawyers and in the courts and is likely ultimately to require resolution inside the United States by the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 10:36 am
See, eg, Rosenberg v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
” This was demonstrated in Weiss v Teachout.Seeking to invalidate the petition designating Zephyr R. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
FULLER, Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 11:22 am
Then along came Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor (No 2) [2014] UKSC 46 on 23 July. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 3:23 am
Ate My Heart, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
Although the panel held that the ATS did apply extraterritorially to cover plaintiffs’ claims, it nonetheless remanded the case to the district court to determine whether the suit presented a non-justiciable political question in light of the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Taylor v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:13 am
Like Doe v. [read post]
