Search for: "Adams Express v. New York" Results 301 - 320 of 441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Writing at the Reuters News & Insight blog, Andrew Longstreth covers Wednesday’s oral argument in American Express Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A woman v… [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:44 am by Kiran Bhat
Adam Liptak of The New York Times reports on a study by Richard Hasen of the University of California, Irvine which found a decline in the number of instances in which Congress overrides the Court’s statutory interpretation. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:13 am by David Ziff
For example, Bloor itself cites to the New York case of Feld v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that Chief Justice Roberts will be spending the next two weeks in the “impregnable island fortress” (as the Chief Justice quipped) of Malta. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:24 am by Cormac Early
Writing at the Opinionator blog of The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse argues that race will be the central issue of the upcoming Term at the Court. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:53 am by Frank Pasquale
I have also examined expressive dimensions of search in other work, in 2006, 2007, and 2008. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
‘, May 2012 Diane Leenheer Zimmerman, New York University School of Law, ‘The ‘New’ Privacy and the ‘Old’: Is Applying the Tort Law of Privacy Like Putting High-Button Shoes on the Internet? [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
Effectiveness of the human rights movement  Professor Samuel Moyn of Columbia University has written a thought-provoking piece in the New York Times about the human rights movement. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
An extract was reproduced in New York Magazine here. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:43 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The New York Times on April 17, 2012 released the following: “By ADAM LIPTAK WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday about an aspect of one of the greatest controversies in American criminal law: the differing treatment of crack and powder cocaine. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
  Roger Runningen and Hans Nichols of Bloomberg report on the story, as do Mark Landler of the New York Times, Richard Wolf and David Jackson of USA Today, Laura Meckler and Carol E. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Constraint and Comparison as Sources of Legitimacy in Reformed Military Commissions To summarize the defense I began in Washington and New York, I acknowledge up front that despite having long been part of the American experience at the intersection of armed conflict and law enforcement, military commissions are controversial in many circles. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
Finally, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases, Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:40 pm
"Justices Have Hard Questions on Insurance Requirement": Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this news update. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am by Conor McEvily
  Coverage of the decision comes from Lyle Denniston of this blog, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Adam Liptak of the New York Times, Jesse J. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Kiran Bhat
The editorial board of the New York Times argues that the Court’s decision in Howes v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
Ephedra Litigation Judge Rakoff, of the Southern District of New York, notoriously committed the transposition fallacy in the Ephedra litigation: “Generally accepted scientific convention treats a result as statistically significant if the P-value is not greater than .05. [read post]