Search for: "Anderson v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2020, 1:12 pm
United States strengthens the case against Trump's sweeping use of Section 212(f)—here and here: Trump v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:01 am
The court's decision casts serious doubt on many of the measures currently in place, most notably in relation to the United States's own national security and surveillance activities, and thus raises new questions about how the European Union would continue to interact with the global digital economy. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 8:34 am
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Scott Anderson, Charlotte Butash, Susan Hennessey, Quinta Jurecic, Margaret Talor and Benjamin Wittes discussed the Supreme Court decisions on Trump v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
Of course, there are such lobbyists, but the description misses one of the most powerful groups, the plaintiffs’ mass tort trial bar, the largest rent-seeking group in the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 10:57 am
Anderson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
July 29, 2019: Capital One issues a public announcement concerning the data breach, which affected approximately 100 million individuals in the United States and approximately 6 million in Canada. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
“Bill” Priestap, Sarah Raskin, Steve Ricchetti, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Gabriel Sanz-Rexach, Nathan Sheets, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Glenn Simpson, Steve Somma, Peter Strzok, Michael Sussman, Adam Szubin, Jonathan Winer, Christopher Wray, and Sally Yates.According to both President Trump (in his personal capacity) and the Solicitor General of the United States, this Judiciary Committee investigation is unconstitutional, and therefore recipients of the subpoenas… [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm
Federal sovereign immunity doctrine holds that no one can sue the United States without its consent—sovereign immunity is thus pleaded around by suing officers. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:55 pm
Accordingly, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit—the decisions of which are binding on the University of California—has expressly recognized that expression "related to [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
In an interview with Stuart Anderson in Forbes, published today, I discuss possible strategies for limiting presidential power over immigration by reforming a federal law that the Supreme Court has interpreted as giving the president virtually unlimited power to bar potential immigrants from entering the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
Texas and United States v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:42 pm
United States, 414 U. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
(relisted after the May 21 conference) Anderson v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 5:19 am
Shareholder Derivative Litigation, [6] reflects the particular accounting and oversight difficulties witnessed in certain Chinese businesses that have gained access to the United States capital markets through a reverse merger. [read post]
18 May 2020, 1:52 pm
Circuit pointedly observed in its seminal decision in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser writes that “[n]ext week, the Supreme Court will hear three cases that could upend one of the most basic assumptions that the Court has maintained since the Nixon years — that the president of the United States is not above scrutiny or immune from investigation. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
United States, 290 U.S. 13, 16 (1933)); see United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
United States, 281 U. [read post]
