Search for: "Art Collection, Inc." Results 301 - 320 of 1,439
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2009, 12:44 am
Mustek Sys., Inc., 340 F.3d 1314, 1318 (Fed. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Plaintiff earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Communications and Media from Fordham University in 2000 and a Juris Doctorate from New York Law School in February of 2004. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:32 am
  Procedural HistorySynthes USA, LLC and DePuy Synthes Products, LLC (collectively, “Synthes”)1 appeal from a jury verdict find- ing that Spinal Kinetics, Inc. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The ultimate goal of an action for damages is collection. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
"The court said that the petition filed in Supreme Court "belies this notion" as it clearly alleged that County defendants "have breached the terms of the collective bargaining agreement . . . in that they, as [j]oint [e]mployers, denied [p]laintiffs . . . benefits afforded by the collective bargaining agreement to full-time employees while holding the title of ‘[p]art-time [c]orrection [o]fficer'"… [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:22 pm
Patent No. 6,155,840 (“the ’840 patent”) and appeals from the stipulated final judgment in favor of defendants Citrix Online, LLC; Citrix Systems, Inc.; Microsoft Corporation; Adobe Systems, Inc.; Webex Communications, Inc.; Cisco Webex, LLC; Cisco Systems, Inc.; and International Business Machines Corporation (collectively, “Appellees”). [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
The IPR focused on the combination of two prior art references: Smith and Faraz (US5624398 and US5824007) that collectively teach all of the claim limitations. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
Defendant also cited a Second Circuit case, Update Art Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:26 am by centerforartlaw
By RaeAnn Bell Donations are the lifeblood of many museum collections. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 3:06 pm by Dennis Crouch
Only 8% of the 2011 patents cite more than 100 references, but those patents collectively cite more references than the other 92% combined. [read post]