Search for: "Asbestos Claimants" Results 301 - 320 of 556
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2012, 11:34 am by David Hart QC
The complication was that  the claimant wished to enforce the English judgment in Latvia. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 9:14 pm by Simon Gibbs
The claimant lobby can't have it both ways. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:32 am by Jon L. Gelman
Lawyers who represent employees and employers should be aware of GINA and protect sensitive genetic information from disclosure, and claimants should make sure their physician is aware of it as well. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm by William A. Ruskin
Should claimants be permitted to seek recovery for emotional distress over the loss of family heirlooms, photographs or other objects to which they are emotionally attached? [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:04 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Be sure to ask if the doctor handles workers’ compensation claims for claimants. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
  The courtroom door is more open to claimants due, in substantial part, to the contingent fee. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm by Mark Wahlstrom
cause lung cancer could lead to a mass tort on the scale of asbestos, IF, several legal, administrative and evidence hurdles can be gotten over. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
As the court explained: The Asbestos Insurer Injunction prohibits actions against [non-settling] asbestos insurers without permission by the trust; the trust may not allow such actions unless asbestos claimants agree to the same judgment reduction that is binding on the trust before proceeding against non-settling insurers. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:40 am by sally
In the Cape case (for which see my post), a parent company was held liable for failing to ensure that its subsidiary properly managed the risks posed by asbestos. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 4:48 am by Steve Cornforth
During the recent debates over the funding of litigation proposals to restrict the rights of claimants in mesothelioma cases (this is the worst of the asbestos related illnesses, almost only ever caused by asbestos and almost always fatal). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 4:48 am by Steve Cornforth
During the recent debates over the funding of litigation proposals to restrict the rights of claimants in mesothelioma cases (this is the worst of the asbestos related illnesses, almost only ever caused by asbestos and almost always fatal). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:39 pm by Walter Olson
House Judiciary passes measure (FACT Act) promoting transparency of asbestos trusts, could preserve assets for honest claimants by curbing n-tuple dippers [Harold Kim/US Chamber, Ted Frank] “$48 million jackpot justice asbestos award for 86-year-old” [Frank] Canadian court: car crash caused chronic cough [Magraken] Push in Connecticut legislature to ease expert testimony threshold, thus enabling more med-mal suits [Zachary Janowski, Raising Hale] … [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 11:36 am by Michael R. Brown
  H.R. 4369 would preclude such misuse by requiring each trust to file quarterly reports which disclose: (i) who has filed a claim against the trust; and (ii) the asbestos exposures alleged by each claimant. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:37 am
The suit states that the toxic dust contained lead, asbestos, and possibly other harmful substances. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:37 pm by Schachtman
  In asbestos litigation, for instance, the defense would find any and all pulmonary physicians who was treating a worker with asbestos-related disease to be off limits to consulting or testifying. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:00 pm
As we've previously reported in our Boston Mesothelioma Lawyers' Blog, more than 100 companies deemed responsible for lethal asbestos exposure have filed for bankruptcy and established trusts in order to pay out claimants and minimize litigation. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
  Section 524(g) was enacted to enable bankruptcy courts to channel asbestos-related claims brought against debtors to special trusts established in connection with plans of reorganization to provide compensation to both present and future claimants. [read post]