Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v."
Results 301 - 320
of 552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2011, 5:45 am
Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen’s firm suing Apple, Google and many others over common web features [Atlantic Wire, Groklaw ("Allen v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
Exposures, deposition, and retention would be expected to vary in proportion to the use and dustiness (asbestos) of each product, weighted by the duration of exposure from each product. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:52 am
The history of statistics, epidemiology, and products liability are intertwined in ways that call for greater attention. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:34 pm
For example, product liability lawyers led the way in the early 70's against manufacturers of asbestos products. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 2:39 pm
Universal Fails to Negate Plaintiffs' Enterprise Liability Claims Universal likewise fails to show any lack of proof that its asbestos-containing products were fungible, meaning they were unidentifiable as Universal products. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
The first major implied preemption product liability preemption case was Geier v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:06 am
See John Maxton v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
Allen v. [read post]
22 Jun 2006, 5:38 am
Specifically, it was alleged that they ground and buffed gaskets and that they didn't know they were working with asbestos products. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 12:10 pm
Sutcliffe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:36 pm
Dukes v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Examples are not driving a riding lawnmower parallel to a slope (because you’ll tip over) or only handling asbestos while using a respirator (because breathing asbestos can do nasty things to you). [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
In re: Prempro Products Liability Litig. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 12:56 pm
Plus, notwithstanding limiting instructions, the breadth of liability evidence tends to expand with each plaintiff. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:18 am
Borel v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:47 am
So we took a look at the attached case, O’Neil v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 8:38 pm
North America, Inc., No. 7 WAP 2008, as improvidently granted.Bugosh was the case that the Court had taken expressly to address whether to change Pennsylvania product liability law from its current idiosyncratic form of limited, but extreme, strict liability, to the more mainstream Restatement Third reasonableness-based approach.While the dismissal order gives no reason, Bexis (who filed an amicus brief for PLAC in Bugosh) believes that the status of the defendant as an… [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 9:05 am
The product liability claims against Fixodent’s manufacturer, Proctor & Gamble, allege that Fixodent causes zinc-induced, copper deficiency myelopathy (CDA). [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
All the while Maya v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 6:47 am
Federal-Mogul Corp.(1st Dept., decided 10/30/2008)Defendant insureds brought a DJ action in New Jersey for liability coverage for bodily injury claims arising out of alleged exposure to asbestos-containing products that were manufactured, sold or distributed by defendants' predecessor in interest. [read post]
