Search for: "B Henderson"
Results 301 - 320
of 625
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2013, 5:04 am
Rule 9.140(b)(2)(A) says a defendant must “expressly reserve the right to appeal a Prior dispositive order” of the trial court, if he/she specifically identifies the “point of law” at issue. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:50 pm
This afternoon, Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson, Janice Rogers Brown, and Thomas B. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
On February 20, 2013, The Supreme Court announced its decision in Henderson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
On February 20, 2013, The Supreme Court announced its decision in Henderson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:22 pm
Green (University of Reading) Dr Christian Henderson (University of Liverpool) Dr Tom Ruys (Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies) Book Review Editor Dr Francis Grimal (University of Buckingham) The Journal on the Use of Force and International Law (JUFIL) is a new peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of the law governing the use of force (jus ad bellum), as distinct from other areas of international law relating to security issues, such as International Humanitarian Law or… [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:22 am
McCurdy, Barbara Clarke McCurdy, Barbara McCurdy, Biglaw, Boutique Law Firms, David Hill, Don Dunner, Doug Henderson, Finnegan, Finnegan Henderson, Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP, Ford Farabow, Intellectual Property, James B. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:42 am
Henderson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm
Shelby County, in the covered jurisdiction of Alabama, sought a declaratory judgment that sections 4(b) and 5 are facially unconstitutional. [read post]
25 May 2013, 11:55 am
Op. at 21 (quoting Henderson v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 2:41 pm
Resources Code, § 21094.5(e)(1)(B)). [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:38 am
Put another way, any transaction where (a) the terms are negotiable and (b) there is sufficient value to justify the cost of an attorney will involve what Susskind calls bespoke legal work. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:23 am
This was a Section 216(b) collective action. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
Henderson and Jason Henderson. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:08 pm
The case is notable both for a) the quick turnaround and b) the lack of dissent among a court that was divided 5-4 on similar questions in Ex Parte Robbins, Overton and Henderson. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:16 am
B. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:45 pm
Irving of Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner and Donna M. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
Henderson, 876 N.E.2d 105 (Ill. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
The key points from Burnip would be that the shortfall was discriminatory because a) their HB was based on one room less than their objective needs, and b) – breaking new ground - drawing on Thlimmenos v Greece (2001) 31 EHRR 15, the right is also violated “when states without an objective and reasonable justification fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different”.It is also worth noting Henderson J’s… [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
The key points from Burnip would be that the shortfall was discriminatory because a) their HB was based on one room less than their objective needs, and b) – breaking new ground - drawing on Thlimmenos v Greece (2001) 31 EHRR 15, the right is also violated “when states without an objective and reasonable justification fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different”.It is also worth noting Henderson J’s… [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:30 am
Author Michael B. [read post]
