Search for: "BARNES v. MANIS" Results 301 - 320 of 677
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2016, 10:18 am by John Floyd
”   “ … According to many – including many law professors – the answer to the question is clearly no, because Bush v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
Zimmer and Halo Electronics v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
This later requirement can be problematic if, as is the case in many intellectual property proceedings, a trial date is fixed early in the proceeding. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This case presents the following issue: When a lead agency performs a subsequent environmental review and prepares a subsequent environmental impact report, a subsequent negative declaration, or an addendum, is the agency’s decision reviewed under a substantial evidence standard of review (Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:13 am by Old Fox
Homes, corrals, barns and grazing land were washed a way and destroyed. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 8:48 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Barnes & Noble 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe Facebook’s “Browsewrap” Enforced Against Kids–EKD v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:36 am by Eugene Volokh
But in recent decades, many courts have been more open to such injunctions, once speech has been found to be defamatory. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 11:56 am by Ted Brooks
Many of us have more trial experience than our clients will ever have. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
[Blogger’s Note:  This post is submitted as a necessarily-lengthy formal comment to the November 20, 2015  draft guidance of U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
Before he ever took his first law class, he served as his own lawyer, filing the original complaint in what is now called Shapiro v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said at issue on this appeal is whether the City of New York and a child protective service, defendant Louise Wise Services (LWS), sued herein as Louise Wise Agency, are insulated by immunity from liability for injuries allegedly sustained by children, both in connection with their judicial placement into the foster care system and subsequently, while in the custody of various foster homes. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:20 pm by Kim Krawiec
By now most readers will have seen the article in Friday’s New York Times discussing Kamakahi v. [read post]