Search for: "BERRY V US"
Results 301 - 320
of 569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2019, 7:41 am
Facts: This case (Vazquez v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 3:50 am
In contrast, on defendant's motion to dismiss, plaintiffs' allegations, including conclusory allegations in supporting affidavits, are deemed to be true (see Berry v Ambulance Serv. of Fulton County, Inc., 39 AD3d 1123, 1124 [2007]). [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:21 pm
PatLit's David Berry regales us with a warning from the US that delay in re-examination of a patent can result in litigation laches. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:50 pm
DDR Holdings v Hotels.com is a fascinating post-Alice case on US patent-eligibility, involving an invention directed towards merchandising on the internet: David Berry writes it up for PatLit here. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 9:43 am
Readers can take advantage of a 30% discount by using the code ALAUTHC4 on the Oxford University Press website. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:07 am
Gideon v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:50 am
But I very much agree with the points made by my colleagues Thomas Berry and Anastasia Boden. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:05 am
See Kay Berry, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration may be required), Ilya Shapiro and Thomas Berry look back at the Court’s opinion in Evenwel v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
And for what may be obvious reasons, if this claim is being made there is quite likely to be a similar claim about "Crunch Berries" (emphasis added) somewhere nearby, as there was last summer (Sugawara v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:04 am
Bank, 366 Mass. 519, 523-24 (1974); Berry v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:04 am
Bank, 366 Mass. 519, 523-24 (1974); Berry v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:10 am
Berry, 2009 WL 424466 (W.D. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:12 pm
McGrath v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:40 am
See Feist Publ'ns, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 4:30 am
The first is Fry v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 5:45 am
"--Mary Frances Berry, Geraldine R. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:05 pm
What the Ruling Means On November 5, 2020, the Northern District of California ruled in favor of Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans by enforcing the 29-year-old Class Action Consent Decree that arose in Nehmar v. the US Department of Veterans Administration (VA). [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:16 am
Culza v Brown and Lay Statements This case relates to lay statements in support of VA claims. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and… [read post]
