Search for: "Battle v. Georgia"
Results 301 - 320
of 442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(IP Osgoode) Federal Court: IP infringement and director liability: Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(IP Osgoode) Federal Court: IP infringement and director liability: Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:42 am
In 1733, he supported the transit of 42 Jewish immigrants to Georgia. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
Georgia Highway Express, Inc. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
(IAM) United Kingdom EWHC (Admin) holds defendant’s acquisition of illegally copied audio files would constitute an offence under s. 329 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: Sitek v Circuit Court of Swidnica (1709 Copyright Blog) IPO – Original Bucks Fizz members lose trade mark battle over name (Out-Law) (IPKat) Should the UK facilitate online filing of registered design applications? [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:23 am
Ruskin acknowledges, the case of Weitz & Luxenberg v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
They worry that the Supreme Court could hand their movement a serious setback by issuing a neutral or worse, an anti-gay, decision along the lines of the 1986 Bowers v Hartwick decision (upholding a Georgia sodomy law on the basis there was no constitutional protection for sexual privacy). [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
So one looming battle of the current Supreme Court term is whether Title VII covers the sexual-orientation claims raised in Bostock v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
They worry that the Supreme Court could hand their movement a serious setback by issuing a neutral or worse, an anti-gay, decision along the lines of the 1986 Bowers v Hartwick decision (upholding a Georgia sodomy law on the basis there was no constitutional protection for sexual privacy). [read post]
5 May 2012, 3:00 am
Daniel v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 3:00 am
Daniel v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
The case before the seven-judge panel asked whether Henry V should be held criminally responsible for the mass execution of French prisoners of war after the Battle of Agincourt in 1415. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 11:23 am
In Kauk v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:29 am
Texas, Georgia, Utah, etc.). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:47 am
Supreme Court's decision this year limiting the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm
Arriaga v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:08 am
Omni Health Solutions v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:47 am
Good for both home and battle, the AR-15 is the kind of versatile gun that lies at the intersection of the kinds of firearms protected under District of Columbia v. [read post]
